I believe former president clinton possess a good point about the fictional of a traumatic event. Yes it may enhance the story, but how far do network executives go to make their money? Why would you want to over dramatics such a terrible incident in our nations history. That said, I do not believe that president Clinton is attacking the value of this "docudrama" purely on it's semi-fictional storyline. He is also trying to save his political career. Would anyone like to see a television series saying that their actions or lack there of led to one of the worst attacks in this nations history? No, so it is understandable why anyone would try to defend their actions.
I don't believe it is right to say that one person alone led to this attack happening. It is like saying, "If you would have stepped in front of this snowball I threw, it would have hit your friend but now it's your fault that your friends eye is bleeding." It is insane to blame one person, President Clinton, President Bush, or any other person in high political position. This raises one question, who should the blame go to? The answer is, no one but the terrorists that committed the act. Should someone defending our country be to blame for one attack happening? It is not like they simply let it happen. They didn't work hard enough some Americans may say, yet, last time I checked, President of the United States was a pretty hard job. So to ABC I say, don't point the finger of blame, it's impolite and you're all grown up, you should know better.